ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the role of Power Arm in en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using clear aligner (CA) and micro-implant anchorage (MIA). Methods The three-dimensional (3D) model of maxillary anterior teeth by combined use of CA and MIA was established, and the 6 mm-height Power Arm, was attached to the canine or appliance. The initial displacement and the maximum von Mises stress of periodontal ligament under three loading conditions were analyzed, namely the force was loaded by CA+150 g retraction force at canine, CA+150 g retraction force on Power Arm at appliance, CA+150 g retraction force on Power Arm at canine. Results In sagittal direction, the crown and root displacement difference of maxillary central incisor was 129, 129, 133 μm，respectively. The crown displacement of the maxillary first molar was -23.3, -23.5, -26.8 μm, respectively. The maximum von Mises stress of periodontal ligament in central incisor was 48.4, 72.6, 40.0 kPa, respectively, and that of the first molar was 5.3, 10.5, 5.8 kPa, respectively. Conclusions It can not be testified that retraction of the 6 mm-height Power Arm at canine or appliance with 5 mm-height mini-screw has more advantages than retraction of the canine directly for more favorably controlling the torque of incisors, saving anchorage of posterior teeth and decreasing von Mises stress of the periodontal ligament.
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of using micro-implant anchorage (MIA) to rotate the functional occlusal plane (FOP) counterclockwise. Forty skeletal class Ⅱ high-angle patients who had completed orthodontic treatment were enrolled, including 20 patients treated with MIA orthodontic system (MIA group) and the other 20 patients treated with traditional sliding straight wire appliance (control group). Cephalometric measurements on the lateral cranial radiographs before and after treatment were performed, all acquired data were statistically analyzed with SPSS 26.0. At the end of treatment, MIA group obtained better effect of FOP and mandibular plane counter-clockwise rotation than the control group. In the MIA group, the average change of FOP-frankfort horizontal plane (FH), FOP-SN and mandibular plane angle (MP-FH) angle was -4.5(-7.3, -3.7)°, (3.3)° and -1.7(-3.0, -0.9)°, respectively. In the control group, the average change of FOP-FH, FOP-SN and MP-FH angle was -0.1(-4.1, 3.0)°, (-0.1±5.1)° and -0.4(-2.4, 0.7)°, respectively. There was significant difference between the change of the two groups (all <0.05). Compared with the traditional sliding straight wire appliance, counterclockwise rotation of FOP can be more effectively reversed by using MIA orthodontic system, and the MP-FH can be reduced as well.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cephalometry , Dental Occlusion , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Mandible , Maxilla , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective@# To study the remodeling of alveolar bone after retraction of the maxillary incisors assisting with micro-implant anchorage in adult patients with maxillary protrusion by CBCT.@*Methods@#Forty patients who were treated with extraction of the maxillary first premolars with microimplant anchorage meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. The CBCT data before and after treatment were collected, and the Dolphin Imaging 3D measurement software was used to measure and analyze the height and thickness of the alveolar bone of the 80 upper central incisors and the 80 lateral incisors.@*Results @#After retraction of the incisors assisting with microimplant anchorage, the labial alveolar bone height of the maxillary central incisors decreased (0.11 ± 0.33) mm, and the lingual alveolar bone height of the maxillary central incisors decreased (0.85 ± 1.23) mm. The labial alveolar bone height of the maxillary lateral incisors decreased (0.18 ± 0.42) mm, and the lingual alveolar bone height of the maxillary lateral incisors decreased (1.13 ± 1.14 ) mm. The reduction in the lingual alveolar bone height was greater than that of the labial side, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The labial alveolar bone thickness of the maxillary central incisors increased (the root cervix, the root media and the root apex), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The labial alveolar bone thickness of the maxillary lateral incisors also increased (P < 0.05), while the lingual alveolar bone thickness and the total alveolar bone thickness of the maxillary central and lateral incisors decreased (P < 0.001). @*Conclusion@#In adults with maxillary protrusion, the microimplant was used to assist the reduction of the anterior teeth. The alveolar bone height of the maxillary incisors was reduced, and the palatal alveolar bone height decreased more than that of the labial side. The alveolar bone of the labrum was thickened, and the palatal alveolar bone thickness and the total alveolar bone thickness of the maxillary incisors were reduced after treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical effects of combined use of miniscrew and clear aligner in different kinds of loading condition on the en-mass retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Methods: 3 D finite element models of the maxillary bone with miniscrews and clear aligner were reconstructed using the method of reverse engineering with CBCT data of an adult patient who had maxillary first premolars extracted. The orthodontic force was loaded by (1) clear aligner, (2) clear aligner and 1. 47 N force of retraction at appliance and (3) clear aligner and 1. 47 N force of retraction at canine, respectively. Results: Under the working condition of (1), (2) and (3), in sagittal direction, the displacement difference of crown and root of the maxillary central incisor was 1. 12 E-02 mm, 1. 29 E-02 mm and 9. 62 E-03 mm respectively, the displacement of the first molar crown was-2. 49 E-02 mm, -2. 09 E-02 mm and-2. 00 E-02 mm respectively; in vertical direction, extrusion of the maxillary central incisor was 1. 77 E-03 mm, 2. 93 E-03 mm and 6. 53 E-04 mm respectively. Conclusion: The working condition (3) is more advantageous to control the torque of incisors and to save the anchorage of posterior teeth, and more effective to control the extrusion of the incisors.
ABSTRACT
Objective @# To investigate the clinical effects of micro implant anchorage nail and Ni-Ti coilspring to lower the elongation molar. @*Methods@#60 patients with the first maxillary molar elongation were divided into 2 groups. 30 of them were treated with micro implant anchorage nail and Ni-Ticoil spring to lower the molar (observation group), and the other 30 patients were treated with segmental arch to lower the molar (control group). The average lowering time, depth and pain degree of the 2 groups were compared. @*Results@#The average lowering time was faster and the overage lowering depth was greater in the observation group than that in the control group; the slight pain rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), while the ratio of moderate pain and severe pain was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).@*Conclusion@# To lower the elongation molar with micro implant anchorage nail and Ni-Ti coilspring might have shorter course and less pain.
ABSTRACT
Micro-implant anchorage was used for orthodontic intervention of 3 patients with buccal impacted maxillary canine,good clinical outcome was obtained.The micro-implant anchorage may provided a new approach for the treatment of this kind of teeth.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical application and effect of micro-planting nail anchorage in orthodontics.Methods Fifty-six patients with oral orthodontic were randomly divided into two groups.29 patients in the observation group were used micro-planting nail anchorage,27 patients in the control group were used the strong non-implant anchorage.Results The reduction of upper incisor inclination and distance in observation group was significantly higher than control group.In another hand,displacement of molars in observation group was significantly lower than control group,the difference was significant(t =9.714,4.491,17.172,all P ＜0.05).Conclusion Micro planting nail can provide the ideal anchorage and orthodontic treatment,and it has the advantages of easy and flexible operation,and it can be instantly afterburner,reliable quality,worthy of clinical application and promotion.
ABSTRACT
Anchorage plays an important role in orthodontic treatment. Because of limited anchorage potential and acceptance problems of intra- or extraoral anchorage aids, endosseous implants have been suggested and used. However, clinicians have hesitated to use endosseous implants as orthodontic anchorage because of limited implantation space, high cost, and long waiting period for osseointegration. Titanium miniscrews and microscrews were introduced as orthodontic anchorage due to their many advantages such as ease of insertion and removal, low cost, immediate loading, and their ability to be placed in any area of the alveolar bone. In this study, a skeletal Class II patient was treated with sliding mechanics using M.I.A.(micro-implant anchorage). The maxillary micro-implants provide anchorage for retraction of the upper anterior teeth. The mandibular micro-implants induced uprighting and intrusion of the lower molars. The upward and forward movement of the chin followed. This resulted in an increase of the SNB angle, and a decrease of the ANB angle. The micro-implants remained firm and stable throughout treatment. This new approach to the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion has the following characteristics: . Independent of patient cooperation. . Shorter treatment time due to the simultaneous retraction of the six anterior teeth . Early change of facial profile motivating greater cooperation from patients These results indicate that the M.I.A. can be used as anchorage for orthodontic treatment. The use of M.I.A. with sliding mechanics in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion increases the treatment simplicity and efficiency.